Mine Monitoring‎ > ‎


Closing the Buckhorn Mine 

The mine facilities are thought to be built on top of contaminated construction fill, which complicates reclamation. The fill must be removed because it is leaching contaminants into ground and surface water. However, the treatment facilities will be needed in order to treat the water in the years to come.

With the gold ore at the Buckhorn Mine exhausted, the Crown/Kinross mining company has expedited reclamation in order to complete the groundwork before the core of winter sets in. This is a financial decision that will save the company money as the current employees and contractors work themselves out of a job. Surface reclamation involves plugging the mine adits and re-contouring the ground surface to resemble pre-mining conditions. As of this writing, the treatment facility has been decommissioned and the administration buildings are expected to be gone shortly. The shop will be retrofitted to accommodate those functions, but in the meantime, as of November 2017, they have had no facility operating to treat the water. ... Read more

OHA Requests Actions from Ecology
Buckhorn Mine with Mt Baldy in background

Over the past few years, OHA sent numerous memos to the Department of Ecology (Ecology), outlining a multitude of pressing issues regarding the Buckhorn Mine, and made recommendations to address them as the mine approaches closure. Below are some of the issues that OHA has raised... Read more

NPDES Permit Renewal

Water surrounding the Buckhorn Mine must be left as clean as it was prior to mining

On July 30, 2015, the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) denied Crown Resources/Kinross’s appeal of the NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit, thereby affirming that the water surrounding the Buckhorn Mine must be left as clean as it was before the mine was developed. The Buckhorn Mine continues to discharge pollutants into the environment in violation of their waste discharge permit. The PCHB summarized the decision, “The Board concludes that Crown failed to carry its burden to establish the invalidity of the Modified 2014 Permit’s conditions regarding: outfall capacity, compliance schedule, interim discharge limits, final limits, definition of capture zone, and the haul road." 

Read more



Accountability for Buckhorn Water Quality Deterioration 
Mine Seepage Exceeds Permit Limits; Violations Mount

In September 2006, the Department of Ecology issued the Notice of Construction allowing the Buckhorn Mine to be built. In April 2009, acknowledging the deterioration of water quality outside the mine area, Ecology issued a $40,000 penalty for permit violations, which was paid without question. Various actions were undertaken to address the problems, but water quality degradation increased. In July 2012, Ecology issued a $395,000 penalty for failure to contain mine contaminants, but this penalty was appealed and settled in June 2013. In the settlement, Ecology agreed not to undertake enforcement action for known violations that had occurred before the settlement agreement... Read more

Crown/Kinross 2015 Mine Report claims, “No Action Needed”

Kinross Plans Unapprovable

Mine Facilities and Waste Rock
Each spring the company is required to report the results of monitoring activity. Once again the mining company has reported that “no action is required,” basically because it continues to ask the wrong questions. Lack of action on the part of the Department of Ecology has allowed Kinross to continue operating under outdated management plans, specifically the Adaptive Management Plan (AMP) and the Hydrologic Monitoring Plan (HMP). Two years ago, the current operating permit required updated plans that considered the water quality changes that occurred during the window of the first discharge permit. The AMP submitted by Crown Resources/Kinross Gold was basically the same as the one that has been in force from the beginning of operations, with no substantial reflection on its adequacy to address the current water quality issues. Ecology pointed this out, but has not required the follow-through that the permit requires. The company responded that what it submitted was adequate and that they would take no additional action... Read more 

Taxpayers Vulnerable for Buckhorn Mine Cleanup Costs ~ Ecology takes steps toward independent review
Sediment pond at Buckhorn

Last November, Kinross submitted a plan to Ecology that purported to detail the amount of money required to satisfy the company’s environmental mitigation and cleanup requirements on Buckhorn Mountain. This plan, known as the Environmental Protection Performance Security Plan (EPPS), contains the narrative and numeric components of the mine’s environmental reclamation bond. During a careful review of the EPPS by OHA and its consultants, serious omissions and underestimations were discovered, leading OHA to the conclusion that the amount of money secured by the bond is inadequate to protect taxpayers from shouldering the environmental cleanup costs at the Buckhorn Mine, should Kinross fail to meet its obligations... Read more

Water Rights for Mining Lapse on Buckhorn

Surge pond

The mining and industrial water rights for the Buckhorn Mountain Gold Mine expired on December 31, 2015, and now Crown Resources continues to operate the mine without a valid water right for mining use, using water purchased from the Curlew Water and Sewer District and trucking it to the mine site as a work-around. Crown/Kinross originally requested that the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) approve a 20-year extension to their temporary 8-year mining and industrial water rights. The request has since been revised to three years... Read more

Crown Receives “Get Out Of Jail Free” Card From Ecology

Instead of paying $395,000 for the penalty issued by Ecology in July 2012 for water quality permit violations at the Buckhorn Mine, Crown Resources will pay $80,000 and do $180,000 worth of supplemental remediation projects in the area. While this is not exactly “free,” considering there have been and continue to be millions of dollars worth of violations that Ecology has agreed not to enforce, Ecology’s actions are a generous forgiveness of responsibility. Crown has agreed to use its best effort to meet a timeline for implementing the NPDES renewal, but there is no consequence for failing to meet the deadline of November 1, 2013, which as of this time has already been delayed twice and the new target is February 1, 2014... Continue

 Failure of the Capture Zone

A groundwater capture zone is the area in which any mine-related contaminants are captured by mine water management, rather than being released to the environment without treatment.

By and large, the majority of the problems at the Buckhorn Mine are connected to the failure to maintain a capture zone. This was $376,000 of the $395,000 penalty assessed in July 2012. Crown attributes the problems to infiltration of storm water through contaminated rock, and so has not taken any actions to investigate or address the leaking of contaminants from the mine... Read more

 OHA to File a Citizen Lawsuit Under the Clean Water Act

On June 14, 2013, the Okanogan Highlands Alliance (OHA) sent a letter to Crown Resources/Kinross Gold informing them that unless they “clean up their act,” a citizen lawsuit may be filed in Federal District Court, charging them with violations of their National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the Clean Water Act (CWA)... Continue


Exploration in the Buckhorn Area

This section keeps you updated on exploration activities in the Okanogan Highlands, and also contains information about the extensive Buckhorn Exploration Proposal that was active from 2010-2014.